tbh I don’t see the fuss about having waiters/waitresses not being happy and enthusiastic like I came here to eat I didn’t come here to be amused by employees as long as I’m getting my food and they’re not being blatantly rude I don’t see why y’all need to go on yelp to rank a restaurant 0/5 and have an outburst on why your waitress didn’t smile at you when she poured you water
grey asexual does not exist. stop fucking pretending that asexuality/aromantiscism has a spectrum. there are no exceptions. if you experience ANY sexual/romantic attraction, even if rarely, then you are not asexual or aromantic. you are sexual. stop imvading…
Was gonna reblog this with an angry response too, but they beat me to it. ^ But I’m still adding my two cents.
What ever happened to sexuality being fluid and a spectrum? Maybe I personally want to use the labels of homosexual or demisexual or gray-asexual (and I have used all 3 at some point in my life) because at that point, they fit me. Sometimes I think having such specific labels can be silly, but it’s also really handy. Personally, they help me feel validated and not so alone/weird in my sexual identity. So saying the identities in between sexual and non don’t exist is pretty shitty. It’s kinda like saying there is no green, only either blue or yellow. Which sucks when your favorite color is green. =/ I dunno, maybe that was a poor example, but it’s just kinda silly to bring such negative opinions to this tag.